Our Blog

List of recently published project topics and materials

PROJECT TOPIC- AN APPRAISAL OF HANNAH ARENDT ON VIOLENCE AND THE QUEST FOR POLITICAL POWER THROUGH VIOLENCE IN NIGERIA

PROJECT TOPIC- AN APPRAISAL OF HANNAH ARENDT ON VIOLENCE AND THE QUEST FOR POLITICAL POWER THROUGH VIOLENCE IN NIGERIA

Abstract

This research work was centered on Hannah Arendt on Violence  and the Quest for political power through violence in Nigeria; thereby redressing the notion of politics in terms of  taking politics as a game of do or die process. The researcher used juxtaposition and evaluation, juxtaposition, in the sense that Arendt’s ideas on violence are compared with the Nigerian situation to Sieve out what can serve as a better political worldview for Nigeria and materials were also consulted. It will also bring to a limelight on the evolution of political violence in Nigeria, this is where we can withnessed the Nigerian leader’s right from the pre-independence to the third republic, the way they have been caused violence in Nigeria due to their misconduct. It will also showcase Hannah Arendt and the Quest for political power through violence, where we understand Arendt aim of violence and see how violence have contacted to human condition. The paper ends by drawing a model conclusion by exposing both the proms and cons in expressing Arendt views and very critical in its findings.

CHAPTER ONE

GENERAL INTRODUCTION

1.1    BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

While trying to echo Max Weber’s definition of state, C.W Mills categorically defined politics as a struggle for power and the ultimate form of power is violence.[1]  This equation of power and violence seems to corroborate the earlier postulations of the Chinese dictator Mao Tse-tung that power grows out of barrel of gun.[2] The attentive consideration given to the relationship between power and violence was heightened when the existentialist philosopher J. P. Sartre while writing the preface to Franz Fanon’s Wretched of the Earth glorified violence, saying that it is only violence that pays.[3] These and many other numerous views of thinkers and analysts on the notion of violence and its attendant relation to political power provoke some nagging questions: Is violence necessary for the existence and maintenance of political power? Put differently, can’t there be political power without violence?

The above questions are timely, given the contemporary inclination of the world to wars and revolutions in which violence is ultimately believed to be a common denominator.[4]  Technological advancement which hitherto was a blessing seems to be a curse by its productions of weapons of mass destruction, which according to J.B Akam, has rendered man powerless[5] by serving as instruments of violence directly or indirectly. This experience of violence cuts across all spheres of the human life. However, it has the greatest momentum in politics. Hence, the quest for political power in the dispensation is no longer through any other means but through violent acts. Humanity has waved good bye to morality and enthroned to the fullest the Machiavellian principle of the end justifies the means. This is a real problem to tackle.

In Nigeria, it is a fact known by experience and authenticated by history that quest for political power through violence is prevalent.  Violence has reared its head in Nigerian politics in the garb of thuggery, riots, ethnic crisis, assassination, kidnapping, denial of electoral rights etc which the consequences are usually wanton lost of lives especially those of the innocent. A trip down the memory lane of Nigerian political activities reveals that politics which is supposed to be

the natural activities of man borrowing from Aristotelian definition of man as a naturally political is no more a fair game, instead it is now a game of do or die what can also be known as the survival of the fittest. It is so because in the words of Rev. Fr. J. Odey:

Leadership in Nigeria has become a huge investment and a life insurance scheme where one has to engage in many abnormal things to be secure in perpetuity. And no Nigerian who has tasted the trappings of office has ever left them without fierce and often violent pressure while those who aspire to be there spare nobody and nothing on their way

 

The tragic experiences of Nigerians in recent elections are eloquent testimonies or attestation that the Nigerian political positions are reserved for the violent and where all actors in the political theatre are equally violent, it is safely reserved for the most violent. Those who are in office already do everything possible to perpetuate themselves in power, unleashing violence on the people. They are tyrannical such that anybody who tries to challenge them with regard to the way they are ruling is in soup. The death of such politicians like Dele Giwa, Ken Saro Wiwa, Bola Ige, Dikibo, Barnabas Igwe and wife of Anambra state etc. will buttress this fact. With this, one would ask, where are we heading to? What is the purpose of political power?

I should think that the aim of political power in every government as Arendt asserts is to enable men to live together, to promote happiness or to realize a classless society[7]. This meaning is no longer obtainable nowadays instead people have understood political power as the best avenue to make money hence resorting to all forms of violence in order to acquire it.

In this write-up, I am going to philosophically expose this quest for political power through violence especially in our country Nigeria toeing the foot step of Hannah Arendt to prove that power and violence are incompatible and that violence can destroy power but not create it8.

PROJECT TOPIC- AN APPRAISAL OF HANNAH ARENDT ON VIOLENCE AND THE QUEST FOR POLITICAL POWER THROUGH VIOLENCE IN NIGERIA

1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

In the light of the above it is good to ask the basic questions which is the leading principle of this research work. Is violence necessary for the existence and maintenance of political power? Put differently, can’t there be politics power without violence? The above questions are timely given the counterparty indication of the world to wars and revolution in which violence is ultimately believed to be a common dominator.

1.3    PURPOSE OF STUDY

As hitherto mentioned above, man is by nature a political animal. Hence politics is not restricted to special type of people neither is it a dirty game. Instead, it is those who indulge in it that are could be seen as dirty. Therefore, the purpose of studying this topic titled the quest for political power through violence is to redress the above mentioned status quo in which politics is seen as a game of do or die.  To achieve this, the youths who are veritable tools of violence have to be re-orientated for they are gradually imbibing this method as the best option for survival.

Again, I want to use this write-up to appeal to the consciences of those whose hands are not yet soiled in politics to keep it up. The fact that violence is seen as the order of the day in Nigerian politics should not make them to join them when they cannot beat them.

1.4 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY

This essay will be significant or beneficial in the following ways:

It will serves as both educating and entertaining material to the members of the general public and those of the world.

It will serves source of reference for further studies and researcher especially for undergraduate students  in philosophy and other discipline; it will also help to know the implication of violence in the, in the society at large.

1.5    SCOPE OF THE STUDY

In this write-up I want to narrow the ideas of Hannah Arendt to Nigerian situation even though they were not propounded for that. Of all the political works of Hannah Arendt, I am going to concentrate mainly of her major work on violence. Even though I am going to highlight her other works especially the human condition, they are going to be in passing.

1.6    METHOD OF THE STUDY

The method of study is that of juxtaposition and evaluation. Juxtaposition, in the sense that Arendt’s ideas on violence are compared with the Nigerian situation, to sieve out what can serve as a better political worldview for Nigeria.

The work is divided into five chapters. Chapter one is the general introduction: statement of problem, purpose of study, method and scope of studies. In chapter two we are going to examine the nature of violence in Nigeria as well as literature review. In chapter three, we are going to examine Hannah Arendt and the quest for political power through violence. Then in chapter four, we shall examine the evolution of political violence in Nigeria. The above work is brought to an end in chapter five with critical evaluation and conclusion.

1.7 DEFINITION OF TERMS

Political violence: Is violence outsides of  state control that is politically motivated  some political violence as part of contentious politics or collective political struggle, which include such things as revolutions, civil war riots and strikes but also more  peaceful protect movements.

Political violence is a broad term used to describe violence perpetrated by either persons or government to achieve political goals.

Politics:  The activities associated with the governance of a country or area, especially the debate between parties having power activities aimed at improving someone’s status or increasing power within an organization.

Evolution:  The process by which different kinds of living organism are believed to have developed from earlier forms during the history of the earth.

To change through line as species become modified and diverge to produce multiple dasein.

Leadership: Is both a research area and a practical still, regarding the ability of an individual or organization to “leads or guide other individual; leadership is a holistic spectrum that can arise from (1) higher levels of physical power, need to display power and control others, force superiority, ability to generate fear, or group members need for a powerful group protector primal leadership) superior mental emerges, superior motivational forces.

Egosim:  In philosophy egoism is the theory that one’s self is, or should be the motivation and the goal of one’s own action. The term “egoism” and “egotism” the doctrine that holds that individuals ought to do what is their self-interest. Psychological egoism, the doctrine that holds that individuals are always motivated by self interest.

PROJECT TOPIC- AN APPRAISAL OF HANNAH ARENDT ON VIOLENCE AND THE QUEST FOR POLITICAL POWER THROUGH VIOLENCE IN NIGERIA

TO GET THE FULL PROJECT TOPIC AND MATERIAL DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX OR DOWNLOAD INSTANTLY, PAY N5000 Via: BANK
BANKACCOUNT NAME
ACCOUNT NUMBER
DIAMOND BANK
FREEMANBIZ COMMUNICATION
007 031 2905
FIDELITY BANK
FREEMANBIZ COMMUNICATION
560 028 4107
GTBFREEMANBIZ COMMUNICATION013 772 5121
ZENITH BANK
FREEMANBIZ COMMUNICATION
101 326 3297
OR Pay Online with ATMAfter Payment, you can use the chat app at the right-hand side of your browser to download the material immediately or Text Name, Title of the project paid for, your email address to 08060755653.Do you prefer paying with Bitcoin, Ethereum, Bitcoin Cash or LiteCoin?

Hits: 47

Was the material helpful? Comment below. Need the material? Call 08060755653.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.