Our Blog

List of recently published project topics and materials

PROJECT TOPIC- Comparison of Academic Achievement of Students Athletes and Non-Athletes in Secondary Schools in Orlu Education Zone – Imo State

PROJECT TOPIC- Comparison of Academic Achievement of Students Athletes and Non-Athletes in Secondary Schools in Orlu Education Zone – Imo State

 

ASSTRACT 

This study on the compsrison of acalemic achievement of 8econ:’arg school a t h l e t e s anl non-athletes i n Orlu Education zone of Imo State was un”ertsken t o e s t a b l i s h ? ‘ whether the stu,.!ents who 3i.3 not p s r t i c i p a t e a c t i v e l y in s p o r t s perform-? b e t t e r aca’ernically than the s t u ‘ e n t nthletes. The survey research metho? was u:;d i.n con’uctinq the study.
Ti.;. nopul.:?tion ms maie up of Pen thoussn’ :XI,’ f i f t y (10,050) stu3ents; bat” a t h l e t e s ant! non-athletes. k sample of four hun4rec’ (‘too), which represents four (4%) percent of the populat ion wno use?. T h i ~cI o nstitute,! two hun- ‘ re? (200) a t h l e t e s tlrawn from twenty (20) secon3ary schools which represente,? h e zone if the 1992/93 an? 1993194 school sports competition, sn4 two hun+red (200) non-athletes selecte5bby random sampling technique. The school examination recorAs for 1992/93 an;? 1997/91t aca3emic sessions were the source of data c o l l e c t i o n f o r the stu,?y. The a s t a were converte-1 onto z r s ‘ e s – symbols A – Alpha, C – Credit, P – PBSS and F – f a i l . Scorcs were ?war4e> to the g r V e s – k – 4 points,
C- 3 points, P – 2 points an4 F – 0 point.W?ightea ?em point for the -‘ifferent subjects were calculates t o answer the research questions. The Gosset t – Test was usea t o t e s t the n u l l h g p t h e s i ~i of no s i q n i f i c a n t 4if ferenc between the academic acii;.\remcnt of stu7i”.it a t h l e t e s an-! non a t h l e t e s .

-C-H-H PT E. R .-O NE
INTRODUC-TION

Background of the study

Sports have remined pervasive i n the i n t e r – s c h o l a s t i c s e t t i n g i n Nigerian schools, but the degree t o which it c o n t r i b u t e s p o s i t i v e
educdtion rerlains a matter of ensnarement among people. Eidsmoe (1961) stated tmt a great deal of guessing has been going on f o r many years with regard t o acadeqic quality of a t h l e t e s . Perhaps, t h i s unccrtaintv about the sca3elic performance of a t \ l e t e s might !lot be d i f f e r e n t froaq the opinion of educators and students i n Orlu Education ?ope of imo s t a t e . Confirving t h i s , Osuoha (1973) observed t h a t the ::-.?rent dec1.i.w in s p o r t s achievement i n Orlu 3ducation zone is hecause of 8ro.w – misconception 5v parents who see a c t i v e p a r t i c i p a t i o n i n s p o r t s ac time cons urn in^^ and deterent t o academic achievement.
In recent times, s p o r t s competitions in schools have a t t r a c t e d ‘nuch a t t e n t i o n in Nigerian s p o r t s scene. This is as a r e s u l t of
the growing natlonal awareness of the importance of school s p o r t s i n the development of s p o r t s i n Nj,–ria a s well as its educational benefits t o t \ e students. Anyanwu (1979) maintained t h a t the need f o r t h e improveaent of the standard of performance of Nigerian a t h l e t e s has added a .?rent impetus to the develo~ment of school s p o r t s programme.
Perhaps t h i s continued emphasis on the improvement of the standnr? of performances of youths i n s p o r t s has given r i s e t o the  logan of t’2e day “Catch them young,’ dhich Anyawu (1979) described as a cleeir vindi-cation of t’le b e l i e f of many Nigerians i n the f a c t t h a t talented youn;r men an? women can ? a s i l y 5e i 2 e n t i f i s d and groomed properly during t h e i r f o r m t i v e staqes of grodth and developments. Sharing the same vied, Amuchie (1977) mintained thdt +;here are several tal~ented young boys and g i r l s i~ the remote Nigerian – i l . !o, e s d.18 i n ~ t i t u t i o n svh O can he spot – l ig5t ed and ~ i v e r i s c i e n t i f i c t r a i n i n g e a r l y i n t h e i r career. “Je should catch these young a t h l e t e s young” he continued. Naturallg, the ssco*idary schools are the most plausible resomce pool for breeding these calibre of future s p o r t s men an? women who could l a t s r be used t o feed t’he national teams.
De spi t e a l l the s e e f f n r t s , and e ~ p h a s i st o improve the standard of performance of school – a t h l e t e s i n order t o enhance sportk development, it cannot be said that a s i g n i f i c a n t c h a n ~ e , or improvement h:is mwifested, especially in 0rl.u education zone
of Imo !:!tltc. For t!?e fact t’lat aca4emic programme i q secondary schools any-where i:i the world cannot 5e d i s t i n c t i v e l y seperated
from s p o r t s a c t i v i t i e s , there is uae? therefore, t o t r y t o e s t a b l i s h the r e l n t i o n s 3 i p hetween active and non-active s p o r t s
p a r t i c i p a t i o n and academic achievement of school a t h l e t e s i n the securiLry s.:hools with p a r t i c u l a r reference t o Orlu Sducation
zone of :*in ::tate. T’ie ar~wement a r i s i n r : from t h i s r e l a t i o n s h i p between the academic ac’licve~nent of student – a t h l e t e s and nona
t h l e t e s has a t t r a c t e d the conczm of many eminent scholars. For example, %Lly e t a1 (1973) found no s i g n i f i c a n t difference i n
the academic achievement of a t h l e t e s and non-athletes in the sch00ls. athers t h a t supported h i s findings were Amuchie (1977) Odunle (1979)
I r o 1983 and Allen (19~~7). Yowever, some studi.e:i ilave mnorted t h a t a t h l ? t a s are ac.%demically superior t o non-ethletc:;, such a s Houg’~ (1973) Lones (1975) 3ucher (1975) an3 R i r r e l (1977). Besides, some s t u d i e s a l s o revealed t h ; ~ t non-atbletes are superior to student – a t i l e t e s in terms of acadmic ac’7ievernent include Glickman (1969) and Kissel (1971).

PROJECT TOPIC- Comparison of Academic Achievement of Students Athletes and Non-Athletes in Secondary Schools in Orlu Education Zone – Imo State

A s several findint;= continued t o vary, there are still doubts i n the minds of many, especially p r e n t s and even school administrators on the uncnrtainty associated with the f a t e of student – a t h l e t e s regardin8 t h e i r academic achievement. This leads t o thc recurrent question of who, r e a l l y does b e t t e r academically i n the schoo1,the student – a t h l e t e s or the non-athletes, even i n Orlu Education zone.
A s a physical Sducation xeacher in-charge of school s p o r t s i n on0 of the secondary schoo1.s i n Orlu Education zone, the researcher is 7rompte4 by tke un-endinlr arquqnent* on t h i s hurning issue t o carry out a comparative study of the academic achievement of student – a t h l e t e s and non-athletes i n the schools i n Orlu? Zducstion zone of Imo Stat!?. llisconception brin!:s discouragement on a c t i v e p a r t i c j . p a t i i ‘ * , , If t h i . s arjyement continued, s p o r t s in Nigeria as pointed out by 2layae (19%) may be i n trouble because p a r t i c i p a t i o n i n s p o r t s i n secondary schools is d i s c o u r a ~ e d . It is as t h i s note t h a t Tbeze (1982) a l e r t e d the society of the danger of i n a c t i v i t y of the Wicerisn students and called for a change of a t t i t u d e i n fxvour of phvsical a c t i v i t i e s . It is t r u e that ot\er conditions can e f f e c t academic achievement of students, both a t h l e t e s and non-athletes. ‘1″ view the ~ m i s c o n c e n t i o u s on t h i s issue a s highlighted i n t h i s b r i e f i n t r o d u c t i c ; ; , the rew?archf:r would l i k e t o carry out i n v e s t i g a t i o n i n t o t h i s matter i n ,Jr.lu Education zone of Imo s t a t e .

Statement of the Problem:

Sports p a r t i c i p a t i o n is plagued with a l o t of misconceotions of its values, objectives and meaning, According t o Amuchie (1977), t h i s misconception h a s a f f e c t e d the a t t i t u d e and views of students who now see p a r t i c i p a t i o n i n s p o r t s as burdensome t o combine with academics. Psople regard s p o r t s i n secondary school as mere play a 4 ciiv,:r..=Aori from work and so did not a t t a c h much importance t o i t and a- suc’l did v t merit spend in^ time and money. Jerome (1982), s t a t e d t h a t valuahle time is spent on sporting a c t i v i t i e s snd t h i s t e l l s much on the academic achievement of t ‘ ,~( ?s t u d e n t s n n r t i c i p a t i o n . i3ut s i n c e both of them cannot be divorcer’ r:?.r-~l.ately, t’le questioq of who performs b e t t e r academici.1’~- , xtuiienti; – a t h l e t e s or non-athletes,has t$erefore remained unansucred. The a t t i t u d e of the s o c i e t y , and other f a c t o r s l i k e p a r e n t s , t e a c h e r s e t c . on s p o r t s a r e feared t o have some influence on the a t t i t u d e of students towards s p o r t s and acadenics. Thin is why iidedeji (19781, s t a t e d t h a t non-physical Edacatj.on t e a c l l e r s , p i r e n t s and ~ u a r d i a n sh ave mixed f e e l i n g s about t h e e f f e c t s of s p o r t s -,.~irtici?:dti.ori and acaclem1.c achievement es?ecial.ly i n secondary school l e v e l . Duhu (1989), s t i p u l a t e d t,hat many parents and guardians believe tLlat p a r t i c i p a t i o n i n s p o r t s 10.reflstudents academic a b i l i t y , since time is speqt on t r a i n i n c and competition. In l i g h t of the above s p e c u l a t i o n s , t h e r e s e a r c h e r wishes t o compare the academic achievement of the students – a t h l e t e s anc3 non-athletes in O r h Education zone of Imo S t a t e .

Purpose of the Study:

The rationale for this study was t o compare the academic achievement of s t u d e n t – a t h l z t e s and non-athletes i n Orlu 3ducatlon zone of Imo S t a t e . The study was t o e s t a b l i s h whether s t u d e n t s who do not p a r t i c i p a t e i n s p o r t s perform b e t t e r academically than student – ~ t h l e t e s .

Objectives of  the Study:

This study is deslnned t o achieve the followin8 objectives:
1. To determine whether non-athletes perform h e t t e r than the student-athletes academically.
To compare the performances of student – a t h l e t e s and nona t h l e t e s i n the core s u b j e c t s .
To find out whether there is any s i g n i f i c a n t d i f f e r e n c e between the academic performance of student a t h l e t e s and
non-athletes.

Research Question:

The folloding research questions were formulated for the study:
1.) 9ow d.3 the academic performances o f non-athletes compare with those of t h e s t u d e n t a t h l e t e s of secondary schools i n
Orlu %ducation Zone of Imo State.
2) How do t h e non-athletes and student – a t h l e t e s i n Orlu Education Zone d i f f e r i n t h e i r performance i n the core subjects.

PROJECT TOPIC- Comparison of Academic Achievement of Students Athletes and Non-Athletes in Secondary Schools in Orlu Education Zone – Imo State

TO GET THE FULL PROJECT TOPIC AND MATERIAL DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX OR DOWNLOAD INSTANTLY, PAY N5000 Via: BANK
BANKACCOUNT NAME
ACCOUNT NUMBER
DIAMOND BANK
FREEMANBIZ COMMUNICATION
007 031 2905
FIDELITY BANK
FREEMANBIZ COMMUNICATION
560 028 4107
GTBFREEMANBIZ COMMUNICATION013 772 5121
ZENITH BANK
FREEMANBIZ COMMUNICATION
101 326 3297
OR Pay Online with ATMAfter Payment, you can use the chat app at the right-hand side of your browser to download the material immediately or Text Name, Title of the project paid for, your email address to 08060755653.Do you prefer paying with Bitcoin, Ethereum, Bitcoin Cash or LiteCoin?

Hits: 37

Was the material helpful? Comment below. Need the material? Call 08060755653.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.